ORMEs - Don Nance WPG

HOW TO MAKE WHITE GOLD POWDER
By Don Nance

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:16:14 EDT
Subject: HOW TO MAKE WHITE GOLD POWDER  #1
Hi :)
I am don from oceanalchemy.com

 ***SOME OF THESE PROCESSES ARE DANGEROUS AND THE DANGER FACTOR VARIES FROM ONE PART OF THE PROCESS TO ANOTHER***ALSO USE THE SIZE FLASK INDICATED WITHIN THE TEXT***

Further realize that this is not a method to the Classical Philosopher's Stone (neither was David Hudson's) nor to the Red Lion. But this process will take you directly to the White Powder of Pure Gold.

Get what ever quantity of pure (at least 99.99% pure) gold that you can afford. [] For every 1/4 ounce of gold, either powder or leaf it. This I do, as I buy it in shot form, by setting a blow torch to it and melting it all into one big nugget. Then, while it is still hot I beat hell out of it with a hammer into the shape of a thin coin, then I file it with a new Mill Bastard file into powder which I put into my 2 liter lab glass filtering flask for the initial dissolution. The gold is soft and does not leach anything from the very hard steels used. No matter what anyOne may say, I have assays which tell me that this is the preferred Way, just as the Ancients accomplished it, except that we have purer gold than they had. There are no contaminants from this method.

I now have 1/4 ounce of pure gold in my 2 liter flask. To this I will add 6 ounces of distilled water. Into this water I will add 3 teaspoons of salt. I will stir this until it is dissolved. AFTER the salt is dissolved, I will add pure HCL, the ACS is 35% and I will add 8 ounces of it. I will then add the Celestial Fire. (you are creating approximately a 20% acid solution of HCL)

Once all of this is happy, One may expect some reaction from the HCL, but there is none. The Au (gold) just sits there, and it will do so indefinitely. At this point, we begin to kindle a fire...but not the kind of fire that you are accustomed to lighting ;-)

Take 1 ounce of 35% Food Grade H2O2, yes, that's hydrogen peroxide, and add it to your flask. The reaction will take about 20 minutes to begin, depending upon ambient temperature. You may or may not need to add more FIRE (H2O2) to the mix, this depends upon the particle size of your gold, which ALWAYS VARIES..What you want to see is a steady stream of bubbles rising from all of your gold. The temperature within the flask may elevate somewhat, and it will definitely give off NOXIOUS CHLORINE GAS which must be vented, somehow, without allowing the ORMUS to escape... If you cannot figure out how to accomplish this task, then, trust me, you do not want to do this procedure. 

You will continue to add H2O2 by the 1/2 ounce, to keep the fire going. I personally believe that this "cold reaction" is soliciting energy from the Zero point or from the Ether to disaggregate the gold, as this method defies rational mathematics. You will always have to watch your fire, as any Alchemist would, to keep it fueled and fired, or your gold will take forever to go away if you do not. IF you try to go too fast, you will have a real mess on your hands as the ACID BOILS OVER ONTO EVERYTHING and ruins your wildest hopes. Be patient here, please. []

---

Outline steps 1 ~ 9
To dissolve 1/10 ounce of gold, I use the following recipe, step-by-step.

1) Into a 500 ml. flask I place 60 ml. of distilled water.

2) I stir in 1 teaspoon of pure salt. Good to use Morton canning and pickling salt. Be CERTAIN that all of the salt is dissolved and the solution is clear of particulates. This is important. Don't use iodized salt and do not use a salt with anti-caking chemicals in it. Use pure NaCl.

3) Add your gold filings.

4) Stir in, VERY SLOWLY, 80 ml. of muriatic acid.[] The muriatic must be clear/colorless, as the yellow stuff contains sulfur and will NOT work. The acid must be added VERY slowly. If you go too fast, the salt will precipitate back out of your solution. This will work, but seriously slows down the dissolution of your gold. When this happens, the salt will slowly go back into solution as your gold dissolves. So if this occurs, just go on with the recipe, realizing that it slowed you down considerably.

5) add in some 35% H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) food grade or technical grade (minimum). Add it about 1 teaspoon at a time and wait 20 minutes. A "fire" will begin inside of your flask. You want to have a good steady stream of bubbles coming from all of your gold. You also want to build your fire slowly. If you add too much H2O2 you run the risk of having it boil on you and it will come out of your flask and the gassing will be extreme and acid will go everywhere and life on our planet, as we know it, will have changed ;-)

6) Place this inside of a shield (nest) and check it three times a day. Add H2O2 as needed until your gold goes away. This takes as long as it takes. [] Best to do your dissolution during the waning moon and precipitations during the waxing, culminating during the full moon. Believe it or not, this really makes a difference.

7) Once all of your gold is dissolved, add more H2O2 and keep the fire going for a while longer. This will help to break up the metallic clusters.

Once this is complete, you will have a very pretty gold chloride. Its ph will be MINUS 2.0 (on my well calibrated meter). It will eat you to the bone. Always wear protection for eyes, hands, etc...anything that you could not stand to lose :)

From here there are several "ways to go." The most direct way to white gold is to make up a lye menstruum of about 1 part lye to 8 parts water. This is about 18 oz. of lye crystals slowly dissolved into a gallon of distilled water. This reaction creates heat and some nasty fumes and needs to be done in a glass jar or beaker. The lye, just like the acids, are always added to the water. NEVER add water to concentrated lye or to concentrated acid. You will have a big problem!

8) Once your gold solution has stopped bubbling from the H2O2, begin dripping your 1/8 lye menstruum into it at a rate of about 4 drops per second while stirring briskly. You ARE wearing gloves and eye protection, aren't you? You really don't need a ph meter for this. Just bring the ph up but not too quickly! Too fast and it will boil on you...if you see some steam collecting on the sides of your flask, you are getting too hot. Slow down your lye addition and keep stirring. This reaction takes a WHILE.

Your solution will clear, you can stop and rest here. If you are going too fast, the solution will clear and then very quickly change color and a precipitate will form. That's fine, no worries.

Stop adding lye when you get a precipitate, this will occur by ph 10.78 if you are using a meter. If no meter, stop when you get a color change and a precipitate.

While you are resting, mix up an acid solution in a glass jar by adding 4 parts of muriatic acid to 3 parts of distilled water.

9) Start stirring your gold solution and slowly drip in some of this acid solution. This acid solution should approximate a 20% strength. Stop adding acid solution when your gold precipitate disappears. The ph will be around ph 1 or so. The color of the solution will likely be gold but not as concentrated looking as before. It may also be another color. No worries again, just look at it to see that there are no particles. If so, add more acid solution. If you still have particles, stop there and add some more H2O2 just as before and break this stuff up some more.
 
10) Begin stirring your gold acid solution and start dropping in your LYE menstruum to again raise the ph of your solution. You want to go on up to ph 10.78 again or until you get a precipitate. Don't be surprised if this is yet a different color from the last time you did this.

11) Now bring the ph back down into acid using your 20% HCL solution that you likely made from muriatic acid. This time, when the particles disappear, the solution will no longer be gold colored at all. This is your clue that the metal bonds are broken up sufficiently to proceed.

12) Now, LOL! Bring the ph of your solution up to about ph 8.0 or so by stirring quickly and adding your lye menstruum in drops.
What we are doing with all of these ph swings is breaking the metallic bonds of your gold metal.

Now what you have is three things from your gold. Although this is not readily apparent! The precipitate that is falling is made up of the larger metallic clusters. It is gold oxide. It is still metal. However, in your solution, is the oil of gold, chlorides and consciousness (m-state). To make a Stone One would do a different process at this point. However, we are concerned with getting to the white powder/elixir stage. So we do this...

Instead of separating the various Philosophical components, we will "marry" them. Many of the superfluous impurities went away with that nasty chlorine gas. If you wish to complicate your life, you can do this...

12a) let the precipitate settle well, then pour off the top water and KEEP it, (You can evaporate this down, very slowly, and obtain a white powder of gold trichloride which is VERY POTENT) and wash the precipitate with 3 times as much distilled water as you have precipitate by volume. This is done by simply adding the Universal Solvent (distilled water) to your separated precipitate and stirring. You let this settle and pour it off (I eat it :) then add the original top water back into the precipitate...then proceed to the next step...or you can skip all of step 12a and just jump right to...

13) Place the precipitate and top water into a boiling flask and over a gas flame or candle, slowly evaporate the water from your precipitate. My advise is to not boil this and go to a just-dry state. This, again, takes as long as it takes. Do not boil it and do not bake the dryness or scorch it. You want it just thoroughly dry. The addition of the gentle heat will help the oils reunite with the precipitate. Boiling it will drive off m-state.

14) Once it is thoroughly dry, you will need to large boiling pot. I use a Visions glass/ceramic dutch oven in 5 quart size WITH LID. Boiling won't drive off so much of the m-state now that the oils are reunited with the precipitate. Take it out of doors, on a moonlit night, before the full moon, and place your dry precipitate inside of it. In a separate glass jar, add 18 ounces of lye slowly into 1 gallon of distilled water. This causes heat and must be thoroughly stirred in until it clears. Don't breathe the vapors.

15) Stir this now clear lye menstruum into your boiling pot with your precipitate sitting there.

16) Bring this to a full rolling boil and reduce the heat, while stirring, then cover tightly and place a brick or some other inflammable weight on the lid to reduce steam losses. THIS BOILING LYE IS VERY VERY VERY DANGEROUS!!! Let it boil, at a gentle rolling boil, for at least 4 hours.

17) When done, add some distilled water to bring the level back up to one gallon. Let it cool and settle.

18) Filter your solution through unbleached filters until it is clear of any particulates. I use a 1 micron filtering system.

19) While stirring your filtered solution rapidly, drip in some of your 20% HCL solution (acid solution) to reduce the ph to around 8.0 .
If you want to get fancy, go down slowly (all of this step is done SLOWLY) to below 2 ph and then add some of your 1/8 lye menstruum to bring the ph back up to 7.8 ph.

20) Let your white precipitate settle and separate the top water from it and save the top water.

21) Wash the precipitate as before in distilled water. Let it settle and separate. Save this top water.

At this point you can marry the top water to the precipitate by evaporation, as before, or you can simply dry the white, saltless precipitate and anneal it or you can measure it into water and have at it.

I would not wash all of the salt out of it. Annealing is up to you.
If you do not get a white precipitate from step 19 it either was not dry enough before the boil or the clusters were not sufficiently broken up enough. This is often witnessed by a color and precipitate forming when you first add your lye water in step 15. If this happens, precipitate it back out of solution by going to ph 8 with an acid solution, then dry it and redissolve as if you were starting from the beginning with gold metal (step 1). If you get to white gold during the ph swings, simply bring the ph to about 7.8 and wash some of the excess salt out. It is about "there." What you do with the oils which are in your wash and precipitation water is up to your
imagination.

[]
HOW to find gold to make it with....
Simply go to a coin shop! DO NOT buy a Krugerrand for this work, because they and many other coins contain 9999% gold but this is the pure gold CONTENT, they also contain other metals to harden them.

What you want to do is ask for PURE TRADE GOLD COINS, 9999, WITH NO FILLERS. A Liberty trade coin, in 1/10 ounce size, should cost about $40.00. Use this. If they don't have it, have them order for you. These also come in 1/4 oz., 1/2 oz., and 1 oz. weights. If in doubt, talk to the dealer and tell them that you want only pure gold. The trade coins have no intrinsic collector value, they are only worth the Market Value of gold on that day. Just like buying bullion or nuggets. I don't use coins for my work, as I get my certified gold direct from a refinery, but this is no matter, I would use a Liberty Trade coin in a heartbeat.

As we talk about this Work I will explain to you how to spot contaminants.
 
~~
 
HOW to find food grade/technical grade Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) 35% strength....
Health food stores, many herb shops, H2O2forU.com...search the web.
~~
HOW to prepare the gold...
You want to buy a Mill Bastard File. They are specifically designed to file metals which are much harder than gold. I prepare my file by washing it in soap and water with a med. tooth brush. Then dry it thoroughly. File the coin down into your flask. Brush the remaining gold from the slots on your file into your flask.
Store your file with a very light coating of pure olive oil.
~~
HOW do we deal with the chlorine gasses?
My initial experiments with this found me using a borosilicate glass beaker and I simply placed another jar over the top (mouth) of it to recirculate the gasses, kind of like a makeshift Pelican. You can also connect a tube from your flask and feed the gasses into the bottom of another flask which is filled with olive oil or water with a little lye in it. This will contain the gasses until you open your gold flask to add more H2O2. Best to ventilate the area. The gasses are VERY CORROSIVE and will damage your lungs. If you do this outside, admit NO direct sunlight.
~~
Shielding is needed...
I do my Work by placing my flask inside of a plastic bucket, which is placed inside of a steel can which is placed inside of a cardboard box. I line the steel can with saran wrap. If you don't, the steel will not last very long ;-) The tubing going to your gas containment flask needs to be long enough to accommodate this and the containment flask need not be shielded.
~~
PURITY...
NO metals other than your gold ever touches the solutions. Period. Use glass, ceramics, etc.
~~
I will next send a recipe which will accommodate 1/10 ounce of gold and any multiple thereof. Simply multiply the quantities of ingredients for the amount of gold that you are dissolving.
~~
Love and abundance ~~
don

ORMEs - John Hudson Powder

JOHN HUDSON'S POWDER

4 L of well water or spring water [John said to use well or spring water  because “the minerals in the source material can attach to the minerals in the  water. The HCL also does this; it holds the impurities.”
200 ml clear concentrated HCL (muriatic acid)
20-100 ml clear concentrated sulfuric acid (H2S04)
2-5 pounds of dirt or fine sand or limestone powder or dolomite or
 Azomite or ……..

1.    Get a one 4 L and one container that can hold 4 liters of water. NO  METAL. Recommend large beaker (borosilicate glass) and a five gallon heavy  plastic utility bucket.

2.    Add 200 ml HCl to the water (NEVER add the water to the acid; ALWAYS  acid to water) and stir this very well. Use wood or plastic spoon, no metal.

3.    Slowly add your finely powdered source material, a teaspoon at a time.  There should be a slight reaction (bubbling, fizzing). More fizz is good, as it produces the best powder product. Add one teaspoon at a time until you have added all two pounds of the material.

4.    Let settle until all solids are at the bottom of the bucket with the water-HCl mixture.  Depending on source material this may take some time.

5.    Filter the solution through at least three plys of unbleached coffee filters with a wad of white unscented toilet paper or paper towel in the bottom.  Use a glass or HDPE plastic funnel (NO METAL). Filter more than once if needed until the solution is clear, no solids visible. Solution is usually clear, but can also be slightly tinted, clear green is desirable.

6.    Pour this filtrate in to a large borosilicate flask/beaker/container
 and SLOWLY add 20-100 ml. of sulfuric acid. Stir well.

7.    Heat slowly to 150 degrees Fahrenheit over a gas flame (preferably) or electric if necessary and stir frequently but not constantly until you see the powder form as the liquid evaporates. This may take all day, and it may form with no heating at all. Remember the fumes are from CONCENTRATED acid, so this must be done outdoors, in an exhaust hood, in front of a fan, etc. DO NOT do this in your kitchen even with an over the stove hood fan! DO NOT let it go dry. When you see that a good amount of precipitate has formed, stop heating, and stop stirring. Wear gloves, and be careful; hot acid is corrosive. Let it cool completely.

8.    After the solution is settled and cooled, and add a few inches of VERY cold well or spring water to the precipitate and allow it to settle completely. Drain the supernatant (the clear fluid at the top) off and wash the precipitate with more cold well or spring water 6 times. John was exact here, no less, no more. Taste it. It should be only slightly salty, and not at all “tangy.”

9.    Put the wet powder is a heatproof oven pan (recommend Pyrex glass, 9 x 13 pan for this size batch as you can spread it out). Place in oven (preferably gas, electric if necessary, not microwave) and bake at 150 degrees and allow powder to slowly and completely dry. Stir occasionally with wooden or plastic tools, no metal. This takes a long time. You can also dry in the sunlight, or use a combination.

10.    Store dry in a cool, dark place.

NOTES:

John made a batch with dried Johnson grass and other plant sources have been used with success. Scale down the recipe if necessary: for 2 L of water add 100 ml of HCL and 10 ml of H2S04 with one pound of source material. More sulfuric acid (up to 100 ml. in a 4 L batch) yields better results depending on the batch and the source material. John encouraged people to play around with the recipe and see…

He recommended the finest grained white sand one could find, where nothing was growing at all in the desert. It must be crushed fine if it is not already fine. He recommended powdered limestone, which is easy to find, but made it from dirt dug in the yard and two pulverized bricks from Home Depot and got good results. The material should have a pH of 9.0-9.5, but anything over 7.0. Look for barren sand and soil with that pH, where no grass would grow.

Filtering: Though he had high tech filtering systems, John preferred unbleached coffee filters and cheap white unscented toilet paper to them as they did a great job removing the fine particulates from the solution and can tolerate the low pH.

Use only COLD (chilled in the refrigerator) well or spring water to wash or add to the precipitate. Chilling the solution in the refrigerator as it settles improves yields (over room temperature).

DRYING IN THE OVEN: As you dry the  powder in an ovenproof glass dish at 150 degrees, the scent is like fresh rain, but do not stick your head in the oven to try to smell it (remember the acid!). The smell is one John associated with a successful batch.

When you are evaporating the solution over the burner stir occasionally until about ¾ of the liquid is gone. Then watch carefully and stir constantly the minute you see the white powder forming, with glass or plastic only (no wood or metal; hot acid!). When the crystals begin to form you must stir continuously until almost all the fluid is gone; then remove from the heat and allow to cool a bit.

---

So there you go, my friends in ORMUS. This is knowledge which must never be  lost, and is something to pass along in the spirit of love, free of charge, as  John wanted it to be done.

John’s powder is offered now on www.cherokeegold.net made with this very method by the man who called and gave it to us all. This stuff not evaluated by the FDA, and not intended to cure, diagnose, mitigate, or treat any condition.

ORMEs - Joe Lello Lye Burn Method

The Lye Burn Method

(a.k.a. "Lye Fusion")


Introduction

Most would agree that the pinnacle of ORMUS production techniques would have to be the classic sodium burn method, introduced to us by an individual whom, for purposes of the Internet, prefers to remain known only as The Essene. The sodium burn method is quite effective at disaggregating metals, but it unfortunately requires the experimenter to handle a fairly spirited if not downright dangerous substance - namely elemental sodium metal. Sodium metal itself is both caustic and toxic, but much more problematic is the fact that elemental Sodium spontaneously breaks down water into its component parts, Hydrogen and Oxygen, immediately upon contact. This reaction occurs so quickly and so violently that it produces a great quantity of heat, which more often than not ignites the highly flammable Hydrogen gas, and that Hydrogen gas then burns even more fiercely due to the presence of all that free Oxygen. If a large enough quantity of sodium metal is involved, sufficient heat may be generated by these burning gases to reach a temperature where the sodium metal itself may then ignite - and now you've got some serious fireworks on your hands!
While elemental sodium metal can be safely handled with the use of a little common sense, it is possible to attain results rivaling those of a sodium burn, by utilizing a much tamer substance - namely the hydroxide of sodium, more commonly known as lye. This process has come to be known as a "lye fusion" or lye burn. It works well with black volcanic sand and it works very well with copper metal. Unfortunately it has not proven very effective with gold metal, however when you consider that the cost of a pound of sodium metal is roughly $150 vs. an 18 oz. container of lye at three dollars and change - it makes pretty good sense to save the sodium metal for use with gold or other precious metals.

It has been stated that Red Devil brand lye is almost as pure as reagent-grade sodium hydroxide. Others claim that it contains contaminates. The author knows of at least a dozen people who have been using Red Devil lye in their alchemical Workings and ingesting the end products for years, and they are all still alive and kicking - but if you are a perfectionist and worried about every part per gazillion of contaminates, lab-grade sodium hydroxide is readily available, of course at a significantly higher cost.

Perhaps this is also a good time to mention another controversy: that of glass vessels vs. boiling lye. For all of you self-proclaimed scientific geniuses out there who are so fond of pointing out that boiling lye reacts with glass, the author has used the same Pyrex glass boiling crucible at least 25 times now with no appreciable signs of attack other than a fine white film on the inner surface of the crucible, and that is only in some spots. The ancient alchemist had no such advantage as corrosion-resistant borosilicate glassware to work with, yet somehow they got the job done without perishing. It is this author's opinion that, especially for a beginner, the advantages of being able to see and more precisely control the boiling process far outweigh any "danger of contamination" from lye attacking the glass.

Nuts and Bolts

The lye fusion method is a relatively straight-forward procedure. If you can afford it, a sturdy, covered titanium crucible seems to be preferred for working with either elemental Sodium metal or Sodium Hydroxide. If you cannot obtain a titanium vessel, acceptable results can be had by using a crucible made from 1810 stainless steel. Generally, a small 5-inch or 6-inch diameter stainless steel cooking pot with a well-fitting stainless steel lid makes an acceptable vessel. Make sure to remove any plastic handles or knobs that may be present, and plug up any left-over holes with a stainless steel nut and bolt. Another caution - make sure the handle is not riveted on with aluminum rivets. The aluminum rivets will melt almost as soon as your crucible hits the fire (...don't ask me how I know this!) and should the aluminum metal make it's way into the lye - toxic compounds will be formed and your project will be ruined. Drill any aluminum rivets out and replace them with stainless steel nuts and bolts, or simply leave the handle off and plug up the holes with stainless hardware.
Many inexpensive small cooking pots have an aluminum-filled base plate attached to the bottom of the pan to assist in evenly distributing the heat when used at normal cook stove temperatures. Try to avoid using this type of pot. When used as a crucible, the aluminum layer will melt and ooze out of the cracks around the bottom of the pot. While this may not seem all that problematic at first glance, keeping those blobs of melted aluminum from reacting with the lye solution just makes one more thing to have to deal with unnecessarily when you already have enough to keep you busy.

If you are unsure of the composition of your crucible - do a dry run in the fire first and see how it reacts. Better to find out you've got a problem with an empty crucible, instead of a pot full of valuable prima materia. Heating the crucible to red heat will also remove any traces of oils, waxes or chemicals that may be present.

Down to Business

Aside from the monetary savings, another big advantage to using lye is that it is a finely divided material, generally present as small beads or granules. The small grains mix more intimately with the materia than large, jaggedly-cut, hurriedly-arranged chunks of sodium metal. If you intend to do a burn using Copper or other metal, take a thin sheet (foil is best) of your metal about 5 inches square and hammer it out as thin as you can with a ball peen hammer. You may not notice much happening with metals that are harder and less malleable than gold, but hammer it out anyway - since you are putting a little of yourself and your intent into the Work this way. Next, using a sturdy pair of scissors, cut the hammered sheet into strips about 1/8th of an inch wide. Then take 3 or 4 strips at a time in hand and cut them off into the smallest flakes you can make. The flakes should be no larger than this letter "X."

If you are going to do a burn of black volcanic sand, put about 1/4 cup of your sand into your prepared crucible and place it on the stove at the very lowest heat setting, uncovered, for about 10-15 minutes to drive out any moisture. When you think the sand is dry enough, place the cover on the crucible and set it aside to cool. When the crucible is cool enough to hold in your hand, remove the top and add about 1 to 1-1/2 cups (8 to 12 oz.) of lye. Put the cover back on and shake thoroughly to mix the lye and the sand together well. For metal flakes, a swirling motion works best for this.

Into the Fire

A good source of heat for the lye fusion process is a propane "turkey cooker." These are readily available (especially after the Thanksgiving holiday) from most discount, department or dollar stores for somewhere in the neighborhood of 40 dollars (US). WalMart and Sears Hardware stores often "blow them out" on clearance sales for as little as $14.99 per unit! Try to find one that is rated at least 145,000 BTU. A turkey cooker offers a distinct advantage over other types of propane burners in that it is already set up with an acceptable platform upon which to place the crucible. The author uses a large de-commissioned propane space heater sold by W.W. Grainger that produces 250,000 BTU of heat. It is a great big bear of a burner, good for outdoor use in cold climates, but it does not come with a ready-to-use platform for the crucible. You'll have to rig something up yourself.

Be advised: If you want to be able to attain cherry-red heat outdoors, even in very cold ambient temperatures, you are going to need a BIG burner. It is also a good idea to set up some sort of a wind-break around your burner. CBS blocks or bricks are the best bet, but wood may also be used if sufficiently insulated by facing it with foil-backed insulation or sheet metal on 1/4" standoffs.

A further aid to getting enough heat is a heat-concentrator or shroud. This can be made from a piece of sheet metal or a length of stovepipe. Place the concentrator around the crucible to further increase the heat on those c-o-l-d northern days.

Place your crucible and its contents onto the burner platform and place a 2-3 lb. weight on the lid. A metal barbell weight works well for this. If nothing else, find a good-sized rock or a brick. Avoid using concrete, as concrete tends to "explode" when heated rapidly due to the expansion of trapped internal moisture. Try to get your crucible centered over the burner as best you can. Some re-positioning of the crucible may be necessary once you fire it up, so have some sort of implement ready. Fireplace tongs work nicely for this, and it also wouldn't hurt to have a good pair of welders gloves handy. Fire up the burner and try to get the crucible completely engulfed in the flame so it is heated as evenly as possible.

There are generally no pyrotechnic flare-ups with lye, like you occasionally have with a sodium burn, but there are still plenty of toxic vapors coming off of the mixture so stay upwind of the burner. Ideally, your crucible should get red-hot, at least the lower 1/3 of it. Once the crucible reaches glowing red heat, time the burn for at least 30 minutes. You can let it go for an hour if you want to, but the author has obtained good results at 30 minutes with both volcanic sand and Copper metal. When you think your mixture has cooked sufficiently, cut the heat off and take a break.

Bubble, bubble...

Remove the weight from the lid of the crucible as soon as you turn off the flame - since this will usually take much longer to cool than the crucible itself and it's entire contents. When the crucible is cool to the touch, remove the lid. It may be necessary to tap the cover of the crucible gently around its circumference with a small hammer to get it to loosen up and come off.

Remember people, this is highly caustic LYE - chunks of it may go flying around >>> ONE SPECK OF IT IN YOUR EYE WILL BLIND YOU FOR LIFE! <<< Always use safety goggles or safety glasses. Work near a sink and have a bucket of fresh water on hand to use for an emergency eye-rinse. A bottle of vinegar to neutralize any lye burns on the skin is also a good idea.
The contents of the crucible should now look kind of like solidified oatmeal.

Unlike a sodium burn, the material in the pan is still very water soluble after a lye burn! Anyone who has ever spent a few hours with their hands stuck in a plastic bag, chipping and smashing chunks of caustic sodium-metal "cement" loose from the bottom of a steel pan will definitely appreciate this point. Set the crucible down into the bottom of a large plastic bucket and SLOWLY add distilled water to it, stirring with a large plastic or stainless-steel spoon. When no more of the burned material will dissolve into that batch of distilled water, dump the water out into another plastic bucket and add some more fresh distilled water. Continue this procedure until the crucible is empty.

Pour the dissolved material, and any leftover sand, metal, or what-have-you into a 2 quart stainless-steel pot (or Pyrex casserole) with a well-fitting lid. Add more 1:8 lye solution [16 oz. lye to 1 gallon distilled water] if necessary to bring the level up to within an inch of the rim of the pot. Again, it is a good idea to put a weight on the lid to keep as much steam from escaping as possible. Bring the solution to a GENTLE ROLLING BOIL over a GAS flame, and boil for 4 - 6 hours, adding more pre-heated distilled water periodically as needed to keep the level constant.

[Note: When a lye menstruum such as this begins to boil, it boils ALL AT ONCE, and it will immediately boil over if the flame is set anywhere above a bare minimum. Trust me - this makes a hell of a mess, not to mention the hazard to people, pets, etc. If you start out with a medium flame to "get it going" - STAY RIGHT THERE WITH IT UNTIL IT BEGINS TO BOIL and immediately reduce the flame to a minimum to keep it from boiling over. If you do not heed this advice, you will sorely wish that you had.]

Filter Time

Allow the solution sufficient time to cool and settle. Unfortunately, this might take an entire day...or longer. If you have ever done anything that has anything at all to do with Alchemy, then you know it takes a lot of PATIENCE. Nothing will come of this procedure that will make anything happen in a hurry. We're not baking a cake here. This isn't moonshine we're brewing. In most cases, the effects of M-state materials take months and years to manifest, so WHAT'S YOUR HURRY? If you allow sufficient time for the material to settle, your menstruum will be almost crystal-clear and it will filter quite quickly and easily. If you rush it - you will clog your filter paper and it will wind up taking even longer to get the job done.
The best method is to siphon the top liquid off of the settled solids using a length of vinyl tubing (like air tubing used with an aquarium). If, however, you are one of those people that just never got the hang of starting a siphon, you can simply use a ladle to scoop out the liquid slowly so as not to disturb the settled solids. Whichever method you choose, when the liquid level gets low, removing the last of it will be a little easier if you cant the vessel to one side by propping it up underneath one edge with something.
The best method is of course is to vacuum filter the menstruum with a Buchner funnel and a 1 micron glass filter, however this is not absolutely necessary. Even if you plan to do a vacuum filtration, you will still need to pre-filter the material. Shown below is a method of filtering that has proven to work well either as a prelude to vacuum filtering or as an end in itself. Obtain some stainless steel strainers (try a dollar store) and stack 5 coffee filters into each of three strainers. Place 3 clothespins evenly spaced around the rim of the first strainer, and pre-wet the filters with distilled water. Repeat with the second strainer, then place the second strainer inside the first, resting it's clothespins directly on top of the first set of clothespins. Repeat with the third strainer. Some juggling of the clothespins may be necessary to get everything situated, but once everything is in place, the setup will remain stable throughout the procedure.

If you do not have a large Pyrex beaker, find a suitable container like a wide-mouthed gallon jug or a large bowl and position the strainers up above it as best you can. Slowly add your menstruum until it all filters down into the container. After filtering, the liquid should be as clear as vodka. If it is not, repeat the procedure with fresh filters. (If your liquid is still cloudy after 30 coffee filters - there's something wrong with your eyes, or your filters!)

Rock that pH!

For this portion of the process it is best to use a pH meter with decent resolution, preferably one that has temperature compensation. Simple pH paper simply cannot successfully be used for this. Why, you ask? Because unless you have eyes like an oriental pearl sorter, it is impossible to discern a fraction of a pH point with pH paper, not to mention the fact that you will need about 200 pieces of pH paper every time that you do this. Practically every piece of lab equipment used in Alchemy can be fudged with kitchenware or other common items, but not the pH meter, sorry. If you are serious about alchemical Work, break down and buy a decent meter, and I don't mean one of those $39 specials suitable only for checking your salt-water aquarium. Get yourself a real pH meter. Probably the best-known source for pH meters is Hanna Instrument Co. and their most economical, yet still decent meter would be the HI8314.

Assuming that you have a decent pH meter, put a sufficient quantity of your menstruum into a large beaker or other Pyrex glass container, position the meter probe(s) and begin stirring the solution with a glass rod or nylon spoon. Be sure the stirring tool is resistant to room-temperature acids and alkalis. Slowly drip in 20% - 30% HCl into the menstruum while constantly stirring.

>>> Once again, remember...you are DRIPPING CORROSIVE ACID into CAUSTIC LYE. ONE DROPLET OF EITHER SPLASHED IN YOUR EYE WILL BLIND YOU. Always use proper eye protection. Work near a sink, and have a bucket of clean water available as an emergency rinse, and some vinegar to neutralize any lye burns on the skin. <<<

The goal here is to adjust the pH slowly, lowering it by no more than .1 pH point per minute. Monitor the temperature of the solution while you are titrating it, and do not allow the temperature to go above 45 degrees Centigrade (about 100 F). If the temperature reaches 45 C, stop and let the solution cool. Go make a cup of tea or something. - remember, we're not in any hurry here.
Bring the pH slowly down to 1.0 and stop. You may notice a characteristic effervescence of the menstruum just before this point - this is quite normal. If the temperature is still low enough, begin dripping in 1:8 lye solution, again while constantly stirring. This time, the goal is now to RAISE the pH by no more than .1 pH point per minute. As before, do not allow the solution to heat above 45 degrees C. When you get to about pH 7 or 8, depending on the temperature, you should see a white precipitate beginning to form. If you are working with copper or black volcanic sand, you can take the pH up to about 9.5 and stop.

If you were working with Copper metal, look very closely at the color of the precipitate which forms. The precipitate MUST be white - any other color except white is no good. If you should happen to get a blue or green precipitate, re-dissolve it by once again dripping HCl into the menstruum slowly until the pH goes back down to 1.0 and try again. This time work much, much more slowly.

The Fun Part

All that's left to do now is to wash (almost) all of the salt out of our precipitate. Find a large slender glass vessel shaped like a cylinder and pour the solution into it to settle. Cover it with plastic wrap to keep dust, bugs, etc., out of it. You will find that your precipitate will settle much faster if it is kept in the dark, so put some aluminum foil, or a brown paper grocery bag over your settling vessel while it falls. Department and dollar stores sometimes have large glass candle-holders that make excellent precipitate-settling cylinders. Some hold upwards of 2 liters of solution and they are very inexpensive, so you won't beat yourself up so bad when it slides through those lye-slippery fingers and goes crashing to the floor. An acceptable glass cylinder can also be made by removing the top portion of a glass bottle, but this will be left up to the resourcefulness of the individual.

When the solution has settled completely - again, this may take a day or longer - pour or siphon off the top water until only precipitate remains in the cylinder and add roughly 3 times the volume of the precipitate of distilled water and let it settle again. When this has settled, taste a little bit of it with a plastic spoon. If it is still too salty for you, wash it again. If you plan to carry any of the solution anywhere by car, or send any of it to someone by mail, be sure to leave plenty of salt in it to protect it from x-rays and EMF from scanners, etc.

ORMEs - Hot Rocks Extraction


Take about 2 pounds or 900 mg (about 2 cups) of "Hot Rocks" powder and add 16 cups (about 4 liters) of 1% HCl. Add an ounce of 1% H2O2. Then add 200 mg of calcium hypochlorite with 70% available chlorine (from pool/spa dealer) dissolved in distilled water. This is dissolved at about two teaspoons in a quart of distilled water and dripped in over a period of a week. The originator of this procedure puts it in a saline solution bottle with a small needle for the drip so that it will drip in over a period of a week.

Add 3% by weight of salt to the liquid mix to bring the mix to 3% salinity. Drip 1% H2O2 into the solution for five days. The originator uses about 10-15 ml of 35% H2O2 in a beer bottle full of distilled water. He sucks a portion of this into a syringe with a needle allowing some air in the syringe so that fluctuations in temperature will pump the drip.

The mix should be shaken or stirred 8 or 10 times per day for 5 days and 2 times per day for 7 days thereafter.

At one week add sufficient 1% HCl to bring the mix back down to pH 0.1. Also at one week add an additional 200mg amount of calcium hypochlorite using the same procedure specified above. Let this mix sit for two more weeks shaking twice a day.

This will result in a grass green solution and undissolved solids. Take the filtered liquid and bring the pH slowly up to 2 and let it rest for a couple of hours. At pH 2 you may get a beautiful deep purple color like Concord grape juice. If this happens, toss the solution as it has gone to metal chloride. You should still have the green color at pH 2. If you bring the pH up to 2 rapidly you will get the same green color and it will settle at pH 4 if you let it sit over night. If you, then take this on up to pH 6.5 it will remain a clear green liquid.

If you bring it up to pH 2 slowly, and then let it rest for a couple of hours you will get some precipitate as you bring it further up to pH 4. After you bring it up to pH 4  let it rest for at least four hours. After four hours adjust the pH up to 6.5 using a weak solution of sodium hydroxide.

All of these processes are done with sodium hydroxide mixed with water at the rate of one pound per gallon of distilled water.

This liquid will be orange/brown in color. Some say it tastes like plum juice. While working and storing this liquid it is best to keep it in a cardboard box inside of a metal can.

ORMEs - PARTING THE WET METHOD PRECIPITATES TO DETERMINE M-STATE CONSTITUENTS

PARTING THE WET METHOD PRECIPITATES
TO DETERMINE M-STATE CONSTITUENTS

The parting methods given here are the end results of much work. They were developed in an unheated space with an ambient temperature of approximately 50o F.  Residence time adjustments may need to be made for other conditions.

Various methods were tried and gave similar results but these are the easiest to reproduce for someone with limited equipment and experience.

Various acids were tested, along with buffered solutions and ammonium salts.  Ultimately, I chose the least exotic for its simplicity.
The separated fractions have very distinct color shades and textures
While no metal is produced by these procedures, the final separation of M-Iridium from M-Gold by sublimation gives more weight loss than can be accounted for by water of hydration alone (assuming Mg(OH)2 ).

This supports claims made by David Hudson and the Essene.
As the separated fractions are not reduced to weighable metal, it is possible that the entire procedure is an exercise in chimerastry rather than chemistry.

However, a microwave assay system which I have devised does give weighable gold metal from this material, 300% above results obtainable by any standard assay procedure.

This again gives some support to the claims of other researchers.

These parting methods are offered in the hope that they may be useful and perhaps even help to open a door for discovery.
 
PARTING THE WET METHOD PRECIPITATES TO DETERMINE M-STATE CONSTITUENTS

I.  SEPARATION OF THE  M-STATE ELEMENTS FROM  Mg(OH)2

This method is based on several properties of Mg(OH)2.
In a slurry magnesium hydroxide has a pH of 10.5, but, the pH drops to 9.0 when the slurry is being used to neutralize a mild acid.
This parting must be done by hand, without mechanical agitation.  Otherwise it proceeds too quickly, and M-State becomes entrained with the magnesium and lost to the filtrate.
Thoroughly dried ORMUS precipitates are ground to fine powder and made into a 1.25% slurry.
While stirring by hand, a 5 to 1 or weaker solution of HCl is added, a drop at a time, to bring the pH down to 8.8.
Using a well-calibrated pH meter, notice how long it takes for the slurry to rebound to 9.1, while stirring vigorously.
This procedure is repeated until the rebound time is more than 60 seconds.
At this point, separate the solids, dry them at 275o F and regrind to fine powder.
Replace the solids in the filtrate and proceed as before.
When, once again, the rebound time between pH 8.8 and 9.1 becomes more than 60 seconds; filter, dry and grind the solids.  Then replace them in the filtrate and proceed as before.
When the rebound time between pH 8.8 and 9.1 becomes 90 seconds, or more, end point has been achieved.
It is postulated that when the slurry no longer strongly exhibits its original pH characteristics, the remaining solids must be something other than Mg(OH)2 .
Filter and dry the solids, regrind and weigh.
Subtract this weight from the weight of the original sample.  This represents the Mg(OH)2 which has gone into solution.  Multiply this times .4168 to obtain the weight as Magnesium.
Note that the color of these solids is very perceptively different from the original.
A dried hydroxide precipitate from the filtrate will also differ from the original in translucency and much less resistance to pulverization in a mortar and pestle.

II. SEPARATION OF THE M-IRIDIUM AND M-GOLD FROM THE M-RHODIUM AND OTHER M-STATE ELEMENTS.

Place the ground residue from the first parting in enough water to create a .25% slurry. While stirring, add dilute HCl, a drop at a time to lower the pH to 5.
Continue to do this until the rebound time between pH 5.4 and 6.4 is 120 seconds or more.
Again, it is postulated that when the slurry no longer strongly exhibits its original pH characteristics (in this case alkalinity) parting is complete.
Filter and dry the solids at 275 o F, then regrind and weigh.
Subtract this weight from the weight of the first parting residue.
Supposing that the lost weight represents M-Rh(OH)4 or an analogue, then the lost weight  x  .602  =  M-Rh.

III.  SEPARATION OF THE M-GOLD FROM THE M-IRIDIUM
 
Place the residue from the second parting in an oven at 500o F for 15 minutes, to ignite carbon.  Weigh the residue.
Place the residue from ignition in a retort, scorifying dish or other container capable of withstanding sustained heat at 750o C.
Place in a cold oven and raise the temperature to 750oC.  Hold the temperature for 30 minutes and then turn off the oven and allow both oven and sample to cool.
Weigh the residue and subtract from the original to find the lost weight.
Final calculations are as follows:
A.  Supposing a compound M-Ir(OH)4 or an analog, which decomposes at 350o C to form M-IrO2 + 2H2O, the weight of the residue x .8573 would equal the weight of M-Iridium
B.  Supposing a compound M-Au2(OH)6 or an analogue, that decomposes at 250o C to  M-Au2O3 + 3H2O and then sublimates between 450o and 650o C.
 1.  Take the measured weight loss and subtract from it, the hypothecated M-Ir(OH)4 water of hydration, which is calculated as follows:  retort residue x .1607 = M-Ir(OH)4 water of hydration.      
2.  Multiply the remaining weight loss x .7944 to obtain M-Gold.


 ORMUS Parting Methods, by Barry Carter

 Here is a little chart that I have prepared with information which we might use for parting the m-state elements:

Element ...................... ORME BP ........... Dry M-state dissolves in Hydrochloric
Magnesium ......................................................................... Y
Calcium ............................................................................... Y
Cobalt ................................................................................. Y
Nickel ................................................................................. Y
Copper ................................................................................ Y
Ruthenium ............................................................................ Y
Rhodium .................. 1066 C - 1250 C ...............................Y
Palladium .................. Over 2700 C ..................................... Y
Silver ........................... 1800 C ......................................... Y
Rhenium .............................................................................. Y
Osmium ............................................................................... Y
Iridium .......................... 5400 C .......................................... N
Platinum ............................................................................... S
Gold ............................ 425 C - 600C ................................. N
Mercury .............................................................................. Y

If you separate the gold, iridium and platinum out by dissolving the mix in HCl, then you can part the gold from this by heating the dry precipitate over 425 degrees. This would leave mostly iridium with a bit of platinum.
You can also take the dissolved m-state and re-precipitate it. The rhodium should be the first to come out of the dried precipitate when heated to 1066 degrees Celsius.
Hudson has a great deal more information on his chemical parting methods in his Australian patent.

ORMEs Hudson Patent


General Description of Invention ~

During efforts to effect quantitative analytical separations of transition metals from naturally occurring materials, it was discovered that ORMEs exist naturally and are found in salts with alkali metals and/or alkaline earth metals, all of which are coupled with waters of hydration and normally found with silica and alumina. ORMEs are also often associated with sulfides and other mineral compositions.


An aqua regia solution of metallic gold is prepared. This solution contains clusters of gold chlorides of random size and degrees of aggregation. HCl is added to the solution and it is repeatedly evaporated with a large excess of NaCl (20:1 moles Na to moles Au) to moist salts. The addition of NaCl allows the eventual formation of NaAuCl3, after all HNO3 is removed from the solution. The sodium, like gold, has only one unpaired s electron and, accordingly, tends to form clusters of at least two atoms. The sodium, however, does not d orbitally overlap the gold atom as it has no d electrons, resulting in a surface reaction between the sodium atoms and the gold atoms. This results in a weakening of the gold-gold cluster stability and causes the eventual formation of a sodium-gold linear bond with a weakened d orbital activity in the individual gold atoms. The sodium-gold compound, formed by repeated evaporation to salts, will provide a chloride of sodium-gold. In these salts the sodium and gold are believed to be charged positive, i.e., have lost electrons: and the chlorine is negative, i.e., has gained electrons. When the salts are dissolved in water and the pH slowly adjusted to neutral, full aquation of the sodium-gold diatom will slowly occur and chloride is removed from the complex. Chemical reduction of the sodium-gold solution results in the formation of a sodium auride. Continued aquation results in disassociation of the gold atom from the sodium and the eventual formation of a protonated auride of gold as a grey precipitate. Subsequent annealing produces the G-ORME. The G-ORME has an electron rearrangement whereby it acquires a d orbital hole or holes which share energy with an electron or electrons. This pairing occurs under the influence of a magnetic field external to the field of the electrons.

G-ORMEs are stable and possess strong interatomic repulsive magnetic forces, relative to their attractive forces. G-ORME stability is demonstrated by unique thermal and chemical properties. The white saltlike material that is formed from G-ORMEs after treatment with halogens, and the white oxide appearing material formed when G-ORMEs are treated with fuming HClO4 or fuming H2SO4 are dissimilar from the T-metal or its salts. The G-ORME will not react with cyanide, will not be dissolved by aqua regia, and will not wet or amalgamate with mercury. It also does not sinter at 800°C under reducing conditions, and remains an amorphous powder at 1200C. These characteristics are contrary to what is observed for metallic gold and/or gold cluster salts. G-ORMEs require a more negative potential than -2.45 v to be reduced, a potential that cannot be achieved with ordinarily known aqueous chemistry.

The strong interatomic repulsive forces are demonstrated in that the G-ORMEs remain as a powder at 1200C. This phenomenon results from canceling of the normal attractive forces arising from the net interaction between the shielded, paired electrons and the unshielded, unpaired s and d valence electrons. G-ORMEs have no unpaired valence electrons and, therefore, tend not to aggregate as would clusters of gold which have one or more unpaired valence electrons.

G-ORMEs can be reconverted to metallic gold from which they were formed. This reconversion is accomplished by an oxidation rearrangement which removes all paired valence electrons together with their vacancy pair electrons, with a subsequent refilling of the d and s orbitals with unpaired electrons until the proper configuration is reached for the T-metal.

This oxidation rearrangement is effected by subjecting the G-ORME to a large negative potential in the presence of an electron-donating element, such as carbon, thus forming a metallic element-carbon chemical bond. For that metal-carbon bond to occur the carbon must provide for the horizontal removal of the d orbital vacancy of the ORME. The carbon acts like a chemical fulcrum. When the element-carbon bond is reduced by way of further decreasing the potential, the carbon receives a reducing electron and subsequently vertically inserts that reducing electron below the s orbitals of the element, thus forming metallic gold.

The above general description for the preparation of G-ORME from commercially available metallic gold is applicable equally for the preparation of the remaining ORMEs, except for the specific potential energy required and the use of nascent nitrogen (N) rather than carbon to convert the other ORMEs to their constituent metallic form. The specific energies range between -1.8 V and -2.5 V depending on the particular element. Alternatively this rearrangement can be achieved chemically by reacting NO gas with the T-metal ORMEs other than gold. Nitric oxide is unique in that it possesses the necessary chemical potential as well as the single unpaired electron.

Theory of ORMEs Formation ~

T-metals can possess an electron rearrangement between the d and s orbitals as seen from FIGURE 1 of the drawing which plots the principal quantum number versus the atomic number. The boxed areas designated A, B, and C establish that the 3d electron energies of copper and cobalt are very close to the same energy level as the 4s electron energies. The 4d electron energies of silver and rhodium are almost identical to the 5s orbital energies, and the 5d gold and iridium electron energies are approaching the 6s level energies. The proximity of the energy bands of the T-metals makes them unique with respect to other elements. This proximity allows an easier transition to their lowest energy state, as hereinafter described.

When two transition metal atoms are bound together, they can d bond, or s bond, or they can d and s bond. When the two atoms s bond, their atomic distances are further apart and, therefore, their density is lower than when there is both d and s bonding. The amount of d orbital bonding activity is in direct proportion to the cluster size. Therefore, a single atom cluster will have less d bonding activity and more s bonding activity than will a cluster of 7 or more atoms. In addition; the chemical stability of the smaller clusters is much less than that of the metal because, when d orbital bonding is achieved, the s bonding is made more stable by overlapping of the two energy levels.

It is known that there exists a critical size, in the range of 3-20 atoms, for Pd II, Ag I and Au III, by way of example, which is necessary for metal deposition from solution. As the number of atoms in the T-metal cluster decreases through continuous evaporation in the presence of NaCl, the solution becomes a solution of diatoms which in the case of gold is represented as Au-1 - Au+1 i.e., Au-1 bonded to Au+1. The rationale for this representation of a gold diatom is based upon the fact that a single gold atom has an odd spin electron, as does rhodium, iridium, gold, cobalt and copper of the T-metals. In a diatom of gold, the two odd spin electrons will be found on one of the two atoms but not both. Thus, a diatom of gold is made by a bond between an aurous (Au+1) atom and an auride (Au-1) atom.

The present invention enables the breaking of the diatom bond by introducing a more electro-positive element, such as sodium or any alkali or alkaline earth elements, which does not have a d orbital overlap capability. This element replaces the aurous (Au+1) forming, in this case, a sodium auride. In effect, the sodium weakens the d orbital overlapping energies between the atoms of the gold diatom as well as elevating a d orbital electron towards the s orbital, thereby creating a negative potential on the surface of the atom. This negative potential enables an interreaction of the s orbital with chemiabsorbed water through electron donation and reception.

The sodium auride, when in aqueous solution at or near neutral pH, will form sodium hydroxide and a monomeric water-soluble auride. The monomeric auride (Au-1) is unstable and seeks a lower energy state which is represented by a partial filling of the d and s orbitals. This lower energy state with its greater stability is achieved by the electron-donating and removing capability of H2O.

Water can act to remove electrons. Water molecules possess a net charge and attach to each other in vertical clusters so that an 18 molecule water cluster can hold a cumulative potential of -2.50 V. The potential of a water molecular cluster, at near neutral pH, is sufficient to remove an electron from the d orbital and create a positive hole, enabling a pairing between opposite spin electrons from the d to s orbitals to take place. The existence of the electron pairing is confirmed by infrared analysis, illustrated in FIGURE 4, which identifies the vibrational and rotational motions caused by energy exchange between these two mirror image electrons.

Attempting to quantify the number of electrons remaining in an ORME is extremely difficult due to the electrons lost to oxidation, thermal treatment, and the inability, except from theory, to quantify electron pairs using electron quanta. It is established, however, that the ORME does not have valence electrons available for standard spectroscopic analysis such as atomic absorption, emission spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. Moreover, x-ray fluorescence or x-ray diffraction spectrometry will not respond the same as they do with T-metals in standard analysis. The existence of an ORME, while not directly identifiable by the aforesaid standard analyses, can be characterized by infrared (IR) spectra by a doublet which represents the bonding energy of the electron pairs within the ORME. The doublet is located at approximately 1427 and 1490 cm-1 for a rhodium ORME. The doublet for the other ORMEs is between about 1400 and 1600 cm-1

After H2 reduction of the individual monoatom the hydrogen ion-single element may or may not produce an IR doublet depending on the element's normal electron configuration. Elements normally containing an s1 T-metal configuration do not produce an IR doublet after H2 reduction. Elements with an s2 T-metal configuration such as Ir (d7s2) will produce a doublet.

Thermal annealing to 800C and subsequent cooling to ambient temperature under He or Ar gas atmosphere to remove the chemically bound proton of hydrogen will produce ORMEs which contain a two-level system resulting from electron pairing within the individual atom. If this annealing is performed in the absence of an external magnetic field, then the electron pairing produces the characteristic doublets. The electron pair will be bound in the valence orbitals of the atom. If the annealing is performed in the presence of an external magnetic field, including the earth's magnetic field, quantum electron pair movement can be produced and maintained in the range of one gauss up to approximately 140 gauss in the case of Ir and, therefore, no IR doublet will be detected in this resulting quantum state.

The limiting condition of the ORME state is defined according to the present invention as an "S-ORME". The S-ORME is the lowest state in which monoatoms can exist and is, therefore, the most stable form of T-metal elements. The ORME is electronically rearranged and electron paired, but relative to time has not reached the lowest total energy condition of the S-ORME.

Detection of doublets does not provide an analytical method for the identification of ORMEs per se, but rather detects the presence of the electron pair or pairs which all specifically prepared ORMEs possess and which T-metals do not possess under any condition. It is the existence of the doublet that is critical, not its exact location in the IR spectra. The location can shift due to binding energy, chemical potential, of the individual element in the ORME, the effect of adsorbed water, the variances of the analytical instrument itself, or any external magnetic field.

FIGURE 4 is an IR spectrum of a rhodium ORME after argon annealing treatment, and shows the presence of a doublet at 1429.53 cm-l and 1490.99 cm-1. An iridium ORME after hydrogen treatment without annealing reveals a doublet at 1432.09 cm-l and 1495.17 cm-l. These doublets are examples of the shifting that occurs depending on the chemical binding energy or the individual ORME and the conditions of preparation. Accordingly, the infrared spectra of the ORMEs of this invention will have doublets within the range of 1400 cm-1 to 1600 cm-1. This doublet is indicative of the electron pairing and subsequent two-level electronic system which ORMEs contain.

A T-metal monoatom which is in a -1 oxidation state is in a lower energy state than the same T-metal would be in at zero state with metal-metal bonding. This lowering of the perturbation reaction between the electrons and the nucleus of the monoatom because of the increased degrees of freedom allows the nucleus to expand its positive field to encompass the normally unshielded d and s valence electrons. This overlying positive magnetic field reduces the Coulomb repulsion energies that normally exist between the valence electrons. Pairing by those electrons becomes possible and over time occurs. Electron pairing provides a more stable and lower energy state for the monoatom.

The ORME state is achieved when the electron pairs have formed in the monoatom. A phenomenon of electron pairs is that the interacting, spin-paired electrons initially interreact by emitting phonon energy. The total energy of the pair reduces over time until it reaches a minimum where no phonons are emitted. This condition has been referred to by physicists as "adiabatic ground state". This state of electron pairing is a total lower energy state in much the same way that chemical combinations of elements are in a lower energy state than the constituent uncombined elements. For example, in the same way that it takes energy to dissociate water into H2 and O2 it will take energy to break the electron pair.

As this process of phonon emission by electrons during pairing is a function of temperature and time, thermal annealing can decrease the time required to reach ground state, i.e., all valence electrons paired. The cooling side of the annealing cycle is essential to effect a full conversion to an S-ORME state. Cooling to room temperature is sufficient for all element ORMEs with the exceptions of silver, copper, cobalt and nickel, which require a lower temperature. Therefore, thermal annealing reduces the time dependency of the electron pairs in achieving their lowest total energy.

All of the electron pairs in their lowest energy state, unlike single electrons, can exist in the same quantum state. When that uniform quantum state is achieved, the electron pair can not only move with zero resistance around the monoatom, but also can move with zero resistance between identical ORMEs that are within approximately 20 A or less of each other with no applied voltage potential. When a macro system of high purity, single element ORME achieves long-range quantum electron pair movement, that many-body system according to the present invention is defined as an S-ORME system.

An S-ORME system does not possess a crystalline structure but the individual ORMEs will, over time, space themselves as uniformly as possible in the system. The application of a minimum external magnetic field will cause the S-ORME system to respond by creating a protective external field ["Meissner Field"] that will encompass all those S-ORMEs within the 20 A limit. As used herein, "minimum external magnetic field" is defined as a magnetic field which is below the critical magnetic field which causes the collapse of the Meissner Field. This field is generated by electron pair movement within the system as a response to the minimum applied magnetic field. The (Ir) S-ORME and the (Au) S-ORME systems have a minimum critical field (''Hc1'') that is below the earth's magnetic field. The minimum critical field for a (Rh) S-ORME is slightly above the earth's magnetic field. When the quantum flux flow commences, due to the minimum external magnetic field being applied, the doublet in the IR spectrum will disappear because electron pairs are no longer bound in a fixed position on the individual ORME monoatoms.

Once the externally applied field exceeds the level which overcomes the protective Meissner Field of the S-ORME system ( "Hc2" ) , then any electrons moving between individual ORME atoms will demonstrate an ac Josephson junction type of response. The participating ORMEs will act as a very precise tuning device for electromagnetic emissions emanating from free electrons between ORMEs. The frequency of these emissions will be proportional to the applied external magnetic field. A one microvolt external potential will produce electromagnetic frequencies of 5x108 cycles per second. Annihilation radiation frequencies (about 1020 cycles per second) will be the limiting frequency of the possible emission. The reverse physical process of adding specific frequencies can generate the inverse relationship, i.e., a specific voltage will be produced for each specific applied frequency.

ORMEs can be reconverted to their constituent T-metals, but, as noted, are not identifiable as specific T-metals while in their ORME state. If a specific ORME is formed from a specific T-metal by using the procedure of this invention, it can only be confirmed by conventional analytical methods that the specific ORME was formed by reconstituting it as the T-metal. Further, the applications to which the ORMEs are directed will establish their relationship to a specific T-metal by virtue of the manner in which the ORME performs in that application as compared to the performance of commercially available derivatives of the T-metal. An example is the performance of commercial rhodium as a hydrogen-oxidation catalyst compared with the performance of the rhodium ORME as used in a hydrogen-oxidation catalyst.

It is believed that physical and chemical distinctions exist with respect to the different ORMEs, but presently such distinctions are not known. Proof of the nature of a specific ORME according to this invention is based upon the presence of a doublet in the IR spectrum, the reconstitution of each ORME back to its constituent T-metal, and its unique performance in specific applications compared to the constituent T-metal.

ORMEs are transformed into their original T-metal by means of a chemical bonding with an electron-donating element, such as carbon, which is capable of d orbital electron overlap and "spin flip". When the G-ORME is chemically bonded to carbon in an aqueous solution of ethyl alcohol under a specific potential, carbon monoxide is formed and the ORME forms Au+Au+, a black precipitate, which under continued application of potential and dehydration reduces to Au+1 Au-1, a metallic bonded diatom of gold. This invention establishes that a high potential applied to the solution forces an electron into the d orbital, thus eliminating the electron pair. The first potential, which for G-ORME is approximately -2.2 V and for other ORMEs is between -1.8 and -2.2 V, reestablishes the d orbital overlap. The final potential of -2.5 V overcomes the water potential to deposit gold onto the cathode.

ORMEs are single T-metal atoms with no d orbital overlap. ORMEs do not conform to rules of physics which are generally applied to diatoms or larger clusters of metals (e.g., with conduction bands). The physics of the electron orbitals are actually more similar to those relating to a gas or solid solution which require density evaluation between atoms at greater distances. Conversely, atomic orbital calculations of high atomic density metals give results that correspond to valence charge rearrangement.

When the atomic distances of the elements are increased beyond a critical Coulomb distance, an energy gap exists between the occupied orbitals and the unoccupied orbitals. The atom, therefore, is an insulator and not a metal. Physicists when determining the electron band energies of small atom clusters suggest that the occupation of the bands should be rearranged if the total energy is to be minimized. The metallic electron orbital arrangement leads to calculations for energies, which results are inconsistent since the energies of the supposedly occupied states are higher than the supposedly unoccupied states. If this condition is relaxed and the bands allowed to repopulate in order to further lower the total energy, both bands will become partially filled. This repopulation, if performed in the presence of an unlimited source of electrons (reducing conditions), will provide a total energy condition of the atom which is considerably below or lower than the atom as it exists in a metallic form. This lower energy is the result of orbital rearrangement of electrons in the transition element. The resultant form of the element is an ORME.

Scope of the Invention ~

The formation and the existence of ORMEs applies to all transition and noble metals of the Periodic Table and include cobalt, nickel, copper, silver, gold, and the platinum group metals including platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium and osmium, which can have various d and s orbital arrangements, which are referred to as T-metals.

The T-metals, when subjected to conventional wet chemistry will disaggregate through the various known levels, but not beyond a diatom state. The conventional wet chemistry techniques if continued to be applied beyond the normally expected disaggregation level (diatom) in the presence of water and an alkali metal, e.g., sodium, potassium or lithium, will first form a diatom and then electron orbitally rearrange to the non-metallic, mono-atomic form of the T-metal, i.e., an ORME.

An ORME can be reaggregated to the T-metal form using conventional wet chemistry techniques, by subjecting the ORME to a two-stage electrical potential to "oxidize" the element to the metallic form.

The ORMEs of this invention exist in nature in an unpure form in various materials, such as sodic plagioclase or calcidic plagioclase ores. Because of their non-metallic, orbitally rearranged monoatomic form, ORMEs are not detected in these ores as the corresponding "metals" using conventional analysis and, accordingly, until the present invention were not detected, isolated or separated in a pure or substantially pure form. Their presence in the nonmetallic form explains the inconsistent analysis at times obtained when analyzing ores for metals whereby the quantitative analysis of elements accounts for less than 100% of the ore by weight.



In the examples, parts are by weight unless otherwise expressly stated.

Example 1:  Preparation of G-ORME ~

G-ORME was prepared from metallic gold as follows:

(1) 50 mg gold (99.99% pure) were dispersed in 200 ml aqua regia to provide clusters of gold atoms.

(2) 60 ml concentrated hydrochloric acid were added to the dispersion and the mixture was brought to boil, and continued boiling until the volume was reduced to approximately 10-15 ml. 60 ml concentrated HCl were added, and the sample brought to boil and checked for evolution of NOCl fumes. The process was repeated until no further fumes evolved, thus indicating that the nitric acid had been removed and the gold had been converted completely to the gold chloride.

(3) The volume of the dispersion was reduced by careful heating until the salt was just dry. "Just dry" as used herein means that all of the liquid had been boiled off, but the solid residue had not been "baked" or scorched.

(4) The just dry salts were again dispersed in aqua regia and steps (2) and (3) were repeated. This treatment provides gold chloride clusters of greater than 11 atoms.

(5) 150 ml 6M hydrochloric acid were added to the just dry salts and boiled again to evaporate off the liquid to just dry salts. This step was repeated four times. This procedure leads to a greater degree of sub-division to provide smaller clusters of gold chloride. At the end of this procedure an orangish-red salt of gold chloride is obtained. The salt will analyze as substantially pure Au2Cl6.

(6) Sodium chloride is added in an amount whereby the sodium is present at a ratio 20 moles sodium per mole of gold. The solution is then diluted with deionized water to a volume of 400 ml. The presence of the aqueous sodium chloride provides the salt Na2Au2Cl8. The presence of water is essential to break apart the diatoms of gold.

(7) The aqueous sodium chloride solution is very gently boiled to a just dry salt, and thereafter the salts were taken up alternatively in 200 ml deionized water and 300 ml 6M hydrochloric acid until no further change in color is evidenced. The 6M hydrochloric acid is used in the last treatment.

(8) After the last treatment with 6M hydrochloric acid, and subsequent boildown, the just dry salt is diluted with 400 ml deionized water to provide a monoatomic gold salt solution of NaAuCl2.H2O. The pH is approximately 1.0.

(9) The pH is adjusted very slowly with dilute sodium hydroxide solution, while constantly stirring, until the pH of the solution remains constant at 7.0 for a period of more than twelve hours. This adjustment may take several days. Care must be taken not to exceed pH 7.0 during the neutralization.

(10) After the pH is stabilized at pH 7.0, the solution is gently boiled down to 10 ml and 10 ml concentrated nitric acid is added to provide a sodium-gold nitrate. As is apparent, the nitrate is an oxidizer and removes the chloride. The product obtained should be white crystals. If a black or brown precipitate forms, this is an indication that there is still Na2Au2Cl8 present. If present, it is then necessary to restart the process at step (1).

(11) If white crystals are obtained, the solution is boiled to obtain just dry crystals. It is important not to overheat, i.e., bake.

(12) 5 ml concentrated nitric acid are added to the crystals and again boiled to where the solution goes to just dry. Again it is essential not to overheat or bake. Steps (11) and (12) provide a complete conversion of the product to a sodium-gold nitrate. No chlorides are present.

(13) 10 ml deionized water are added and again boiled to just dry salts. This step is repeated once. This step eliminates any excess nitric acid which may be present.

(14) Thereafter, the just dry material is diluted to 80 ml with deionized water. The solution will have a pH of approximately 1. This step causes the nitrate to dissociate to obtain NaAu in water with a small amount of HNO3 remaining .

(15) The pH is adjusted very slowly with dilute sodium hydroxide to 7.0 + 0.2. This will eliminate all free acid, leaving only NaAu in water.

(16) The NaAu hydrolyzes with the water and dissociates to form HAu. The product will be a white precipitate in water. The Au atoms have water at the surface which creates a voluminous cotton-like product.

(17) The white precipitate is decanted off from any dark grey solids and filtered through a 0.45 micron cellulose nitrate filter paper. Any dark grey solids of sodium auride should be redissolved and again processed starting at step (1).

(18) The filtered white precipitate on the filter paper is vacuum dried at 120° C for two hours. The dry solid should be light grey in color which is HAu.H2O and is easily removed from the filter paper.

(19) The monoatomic gold is placed in a porcelain ignition boat and annealed at 300° C under an inert gas to remove hydrogen and to form a very chemically and thermally stable white gold monomer.

(20) After cooling, the ignited white gold can be cleaned of remaining traces of sodium by digesting with dilute nitric acid for approximately one hour.

(21) The insoluble white gold is filtered on 0.45 micron paper and vacuum dried at 120° C for two hours. The white powder product obtained from the filtration and drying is pure G-ORME.

The G-ORME made according to this invention will exhibit the special properties described in the "General Description" of this application, including catalytic activity, special magnetic properties, resistance to sintering at high temperatures, and resistance to aqua regia and cyanide attack.

Example 2: Recovery of Metallic Gold from Naturally Occurring Material Containing G-ORMES ~

(1) 300 gr of dried material assayed by conventional techniques to show no gold present, ground to less than 200 mesh, is placed in a one-gallon vessel, fitted with electrodes, with 120 gr NaCl (Morton rock salt), 10 gr KBr, and 2 liters of tap water.

(2) The anode consists of a pair of 3/8" x 12" carbon welding rods wrapped together with No. 10 copper wire. The cathode consists of 1-5/8" ID x 14" glass tube with a medium porosity glass frit (ASTM 10-15 M) with a 1" x 15" x 1/16" stainless steel strip inside in a solution of 36 gr/l NaCl (approximately 500 ml). Both electrodes are placed into the sample vessel and supported by clamps extending about 5" into the sample solution.

(3) The sample is placed on a roller table at approximately 10 revolutions per minute. The electrodes are connected to a power supply consisting of a 120 volt variac in conjunction with a 2-3 amp 400-600 PIV rectifier. A 100 watt light bulb and the electrodes are hooked in series. The rectifier load is connected to the anode since the rectifier filters out all negative voltage and only passes positive voltage.

(4) The sample is kept under load for a period of 6-1/2 hours. The final pH is in the range of 3 - 6.5. The voltage across the electrode is 5 volts.

(5) After disconnecting the load, the sample was allowed to settle and the solution over the settled out material was removed by decantation using a peristallic pump.

(6) 800ml of the sample was placed in a 1000 ml beaker and 20 ml concentrated sulfuric acid was added to the solution.

(7) With stirring, the solution was boiled down slowly on a hotplate until the solution was just dry. "Just dry" is as defined in Example 1. The just dry salt contains sodium gold chloride.

(8) The just dry salt was taken up in 400 ml deionized water and again boiled down to the just dry condition. There should be no discoloration at this point, i.e., a clear solution is formed.

(9) The just dry salt was then taken up in 400 ml 6M HCl, and thereafter boiled down to the just dry condition. The dilution and boiling down step was repeated four times, alternating with a deionized water and a 6M HCl wash, with the sequence controlled so that the last washing was with 6M HCl. The purpose of steps (8) and (9) is to remove all traces of hypochlorite oxidant.

(10) The just dry salts are taken up in 400 ml anhydrous ethanol and stirred for approximately ten minutes. This step is to dissolve the gold chloride salt, to remove the sodium chloride.

(11) After stirring, the slurry was filtered through #42 paper on a Buchner funnel.

(12) 5ml of concentrated sulfuric acid was slowly added to the filtrate, mixed, and the filtrate was then allowed to sit for approximately one hour. The filtrate was filtered through #42 filter paper on a Buchner funnel, and then passed through a filter of 0.5 micron Teflon. The sulfuric acid precipitates out any calcium. Filtration removes the precipitant and a light yellow filtrate is recovered, with all traces of calcium sulphate removed.

(13) The light yellow solution was again boiled down to just dry, taking care to avoid any charring. At this point there should be no further evaporation of ethanol and the just dry residue should be free of color. The residue should have a sweet smell similar to burnt sugar. The occurrence of the sweet smell indicates the end point of the boil-down.

(14) The just dry residue is taken up in 600 ml deionized water to provide a water-soluble gold form which is the gold auride. If desired, the G-ORME can be recovered at this stage or converted into metallic gold. For gold recovery, the solution is put into a 1000 ml beaker and an electrolysis unit was set up as shown in FIGURE 2 of the drawing.

As shown in FIGURE 2 of the drawing, the electrolysis unit comprises a 220 volt, 120 amp power supply (20) which is connected to the anode (12) and cathode (14) of the electrolytic cell. The solution is stirred using a magnetic stirrer (16). The anode (12) is a gold electrode, 2 cm2 in size, upon which gold in solution will plate out. The cathode (14) comprises a 6.8 cm2 platinum electrode contained in a Nafion 117 chamber (18). Nafion 117 is a perfluorocarbon sulfonic acid membrane, marketed by the duPont Company, and is a proton-conducting membrane. Inside the Nafion chamber is 200 ml of electrolyte solution containing 5 ml sulfuric acid per 600 ml of electrolyte solution. It is important to keep the Nafion chamber wet at all times. The potential was measured across the electrodes and then an additional -2.2 volts potential was applied and maintained for a period of two hours.

(15) After the two hours, the potential was raised to 3.0 volts and maintained for approximately 18 hours. Bubbles formed on both the gold and platinum electrodes. A black material formed on the gold electrode after three to four hours.

(16) The gold electrode was removed from solution while voltage was still being applied. The electrode was dried in a vacuum oven overnight at 115° C. The electrode was weighed before and after the plating to determine the amount of gold collected.

The metallic gold is, therefore, produced from a naturally occurring ore which, when subjected to conventional assaying, does not test positive for gold.

Example 3: The Preparation of Platinum Group Elements In Monoatomic State (ORMEs) From Pure Metals ~

The non-metallic, monoatomic transition elements of the platinum group are prepared as follows:

(1) A selected sample of pure metal or metal salts from the group platinum, palladium, ruthenium, osmium, rhodium, or iridium are pulverized to a finely divided powder.

(2) 5.0 gr of a single select elemental metal powder is intimately blended with 30 gr sodium peroxide and 10 gr sodium hydroxide (silica free) in an agate mortar and pestle.

(3) The blended sample is placed in a zirconium crucible and fused over a Meeker burner at maximum heat for 30 minutes.

(4) After cooling the melt, the crucible is placed into a 600 ml beaker containing 300 ml of 6M HCl.

(5) The melt should completely dissolve into the HCl. The crucible is removed from the solution and rinsed with water, and the HCl solution is carefully inspected for any insoluble metals or metal oxides which, if present, must be filtered out and fused again as in step (2) above.

(6) The HCl solution is gently boiled down to just dry salts. "Just dry" is as defined in Example 1.

(7) The just dry salts are taken up in 300 ml of pH 1 HCl solution and then gently boiled down to salts again. The salts at this point, depending on the selected metal sample, are alkali chlorides together with alkali-cluster-noble metals-metal chlorides.

(8) The procedure of steps (6) and (7) is repeated four times, being careful not to bake the salts.

(9) The salts are diluted with 400 ml of deionized water.

(10) 30 ml of concentrated perchloric acid is added to the solution and then slowly boiled to fumes of perchloric acid.

(11) Steps (9) and (10) are repeated three additional times. If the solution salts out before fuming is achieved, it is necessary to add an additional 5 ml of perchloric acid to replace acid lost in fuming. If ruthenium or osmium is the select metal, steps (10), (11) and (12) must be carried out under reflux and washed back with water since ruthenium and osmium will volatilize. The salts at this point, depending on the selected metal sample, are alkali monoatomic noble metal oxides.

(12) The salts are diluted to 400 ml with deionized water.

(13) The pH is adjusted very slowly with sodium hydroxide solution until the solution maintains the pH of 7.0 +- 0.2 for more than 12 hours.

(14) Boil the solution for several hours, adding deionized water to maintain 400 ml during the entire boiling until a reddish-brown hydroxide precipitant is formed which is filtered on a fine fritted, glass filter.

(15) The hydroxide precipitant is dissolved off the fritted glass filter with 400 ml of pH 1 HCl and then boiled for approximately ten minutes. If the sample contains rhodium or iridium, sodium bromate should be added as an oxidant prior to boiling.

(16) The solution is neutralized slowly with sodium bicarbonate to pH 7, and the solution is boiled again and allowed to cool.

(17) The precipitant which is formed is filtered again through a fine fritted glass filter. The material at this point, depending on the selected metal sample, is a monoatomic noble element hydroxide.

(18) The hydroxide together with the filter are vacuum dried at 120° C for approximately 12 hours.

(19) The dried material is carefully transferred from the filter to a quartz ignition boat.

(20) The ignition boat is placed in a cold tube furnace and the temperature is slowly (2° C/min) raised under a hydrogen atmosphere to 600° C and held at this temperature for one hour and then slowly (2.5° C/min) cooled down to room temperature under hydrogen and then the sample is purged with argon for approximately one hour to remove occluded hydrogen. The material, an ORME, will be a greyish-black powder and will be completely amorphous to x-ray analysis. In other words, a certified pure noble metal powder has been converted to a "non-analyzable" form.

At this point the ORMEs, depending upon the selected element sample, will be orbitally rearranged due to the d orbital hole or holes, i.e., positive hole(s). The ORMEs are identified as having an infrared doublet between 1400 and 1600 cm-1. The doublet indicates the presence of an electron pair moving between the d and s orbitals.

These materials have a number of applications as previously described, one of which is as catalysts in an electrochemical cell.

Example 4: Procedure for Separation of Platinum Group Elements (PEGs) from Ore Containing ORMEs ~

The class of ores which are processed to form ORMEs, when analyzed by conventional instruments normally used for determination of Platinum Group Metals (PGM), will indicate that essentially no metals of this PGM group are present.

In the separation of the PGE from the ore, the pretreatment of the ore sample is crucial. If the sample is not prepared properly, the pegs in their ORME state are virtually impossible to separate. The separated elements are not necessarily in an ORME state.

The purpose of the pretreatment is primarily for the removal of silica. Pretreatment comprises crushing and pulverizing the ore to a fine powder (-200 mesh). A sample of 50 gr of the pulverized ore and 100 gr ammonium bifluoride, NH4HF2, are weighed and placed in a 1000 ml Teflon beaker. The ore and NH4HF2 are moistened with distilled water and approximately 200 ml HF (hydrofluoric acid) is added. The sample is baked to dryness on a hotplate. This procedure is repeated four times each with more HF. The sample is transferred to a platinum dish and roasted over a hot flame until the sample turns a dull red-brown color. After this treatment, most of the silica has been removed as H2SiF6 (white fumes that evolve during roasting).

The sample is now placed in a zirconium crucible with 200 gr NaNO3 (sodium nitrate) and 500 gr Na2CO3 (sodium carbonate). The sample is then fused using a Fisher burner and a propane torch to a red hot melt. When cool, the fusion should be an aquamarine color, or a light brown color. The light brown color means the sample has passed through the aquamarine stage. This poses no problems in the subsequent separation and determination of the pegs. If the melt cools to a light green color, fusion is not complete. It must be fused again until it reaches the aquamarine end point.

In the zirconium crucible containing the cooled melt, place an "X" shaped Teflon coated stirring bar and minimum amount of distilled water. Place the crucible in a beaker and cover with a watch glass. Place the beaker on a stir plate to slurry/dissolve the sample from the crucible. A minimum amount of distilled water should be used in the removal. The sample is now ready for distillation.

(1)  Distillation & Separation of Osmium & Ruthenium ~

The first pegs are separated by a perchloric acid distillation with ruthenium and osmium being distilled off as RuO4 and OsO4. Platinum, palladium, rhodium, and iridium are left in the pot liquor. The distillation apparatus in diagrammatic form is illustrated in FIGURE 3 of the drawing, as used on a 5 gr sample of ore.

Referring to FIGURE 3 of the drawing, Flask #1 has a 500 ml volume and contains 5 gr of ore in 250 ml of solution/slurry. Flask #2 has a 250 ml volume with 60 ml 1:1 HCl and 15 ml 30% H2O2. Flask #3 has a 50 ml volume with 20 ml 1:1 HCl and 15 ml 30% H2O2. Flask #4 has a 200 ml volume with 100 ml 1:1 HCl saturated with SO2 (sulfur dioxide). Flasks #5 and #6 have a 100 ml volume with 60 ml 1:1 HCl saturated with SO2. The flasks are all interconnected with glass conduits and ground glass ball and socket joints. The distillation proceeds as follows: A closed system is used with N2 (nitrogen) as a carrier gas for RuO4 and OsO4. To Flask #1 60 ml of 70 % HClO4 (perchloric acid) is added slowly from the separatory funnel 10. Once all of the HClO4 is added, the flask is heated. At a temperature of 105-112° C, a white cloud is seen flowing into Flask #2. The heat is continued until fumes of HClO4 begin to come off at approximately 175 C. The heating is continued to 210° C when the temperature stops rising. The system is then cooled to 100 C. At this point 20 ml of 70% HClO4 and 20 ml distilled water are added to Flask #1, again through the separatory funnel; and the system is heated to 210° C again, then cooled again to 100° C. 10 ml of 70% HClO4 and 10 ml distilled water are added to

Flask #1 and the sample is heated again to 210° C. The distillation is repeated once more as before.
After the fourth distillation, the heat on Flask #1 is turned off and heat is applied to Flask #2, bringing it to a boil slowly to drive any OsO4 out of the RuO4 fraction. Nitrogen purge gas is still flowing and must be controlled to prevent back flow. Boiling is continued until Flask #3 is almost full or the H2O2 has been almost driven out of Flask #3. The presence of H2O2 is indicated by tiny bubbles forming all over the glass surface. The entire system is then cooled to room temperature, with the nitrogen gas flowing continuously through the cool down.

The distillation receiving flasks are then dismantled. Flask #4, #5, and #6 contain the osmium fraction as OsO4. These are combined in a 600 ml beaker. Flask #2 and #3 contain the ruthenium fraction as RuO4 and are combined in a 600 ml beaker. The contents of Flask #1 which contains platinum, palladium, rhodium, and iridium are retained in the distillation flask to remove HClO4 by heating to dryness as described in Section 4. These fractions are now ready for further analysis and separation. The osmium and ruthenium fractions must sit in solution at room temperature for 16-24 hours before continuing with the steps (2) and (3).

(2) Separation of Osmium ~

The osmium distillate after sitting for 16-24 hours at room temperature is processed as follows: The osmium fraction from the distillation is slowly evaporated to approximately 10 ml of solution. Then 25 ml of concentrated HCl (hydrochloric acid) are added and the sample is again evaporated to approximately 10 ml. This is repeated five times. On the last digestion, the sample is carefully taken to moist salts at which point it is diluted to 200 ml with distilled water and brought to a boil. The hot solution is filtered through #42 Whatman paper, washing with a minimum amount of 0.1 N HCl.

After cooling to approximately 40° C, the pH of the sample is then slowly adjusted on a calibrated pH meter using a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (sodium bicarbonate), to a pH of 4 while stirring vigorously. The solution then is gently boiled for 5-10 minutes, removed from the heat, and let stand for a period of at least twelve hours. The osmium precipitates are a reddish-brown hydrated dioxide.

The solution is filtered through a dry, tared porcelain filter crucible using the Walters crucible holder. Most of the solution is decanted through the filter crucible, being careful not to disturb or float the precipitate. The filter should not pull dry. Pour the last 100-200 ml of solution containing precipitate in the filter. Be prepared to immediately rinse the precipitate with hot 1% w/v NH4Cl solution (filtered through 0.45 micron pad during preparation). A wetted rubber policeman is used to thoroughly scrub the beaker and rinse after each scrub with hot 1% NH4Cl.
The crucible is dried overnight at 105° C in a vacuum oven. The cooled, dry crucible is weighed and the approximate osmium value is calculated from this OsO2 weight.

With the crucible on vacuum again, the precipitate is rinsed with two aliquots of 20 ml each saturated NH4Cl solution. Leave 100-200 mg of the solid NH4Cl on the precipitate. Dry gently in a vacuum oven for 1-2 hours at 100° C.

The sample is now ready for tube furnace hydrogen reduction. Place the filter crucible on its side in a quartz tube, and insert the tube into the furnace center. Start argon and hydrogen gas flow through the furnace. Allow the temperature to increase slowly to dehydrate the precipitate without igniting it. Decrease the argon flow until only hydrogen flows. Then heat at 360-375° C until all NH4Cl is sublimed.

Continue heating the precipitate in hydrogen only at 500° C for 20 minutes to complete reduction to osmium metal. Cool the crucible in hydrogen to ambient temperature. Replace hydrogen with carbon dioxide for 20 minutes to prevent any oxidation when the reduced metal is first exposed to air. Weigh as elemental osmium.

(3) Separation of Ruthenium ~

The ruthenium distillate after sitting 16-24 hours at room temperature is processed as follows: The ruthenium fraction from the distillation is slowly evaporated to approximately 10 ml of solution. Then 25 ml of concentrated HCl are added and the sample is digested again to approximately 10 ml. This procedure is repeated five times. On the last digestion, the sample is carefully taken to moist salts on a steam bath. The sample must not be hot enough for HClO4 traces to reoxidize the ruthenium. Add 200 ml of distilled water, and bring the solution to a boil. Filter the hot solution through No. 42 Whatman paper, washing with a minimum amount of 0.1 N HCl.

After cooling to approximately 40° C, the pH of the sample is slowly adjusted on a calibrated pH meter with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 to pH 6 while stirring vigorously. The solution is brought to a gentle boil for 5-10 minutes before removing it from the heat. The sample is permitted to stand for a period of at least twelve hours. The ruthenium precipitates as a yellowish-brown hydrated dioxide.

The solution is filtered through a #42 Whatman ashless filter paper wetted with 1% w/v (NH4)2SO4 (filtered through a 0.45 micron pad during preparation). Decant most of the solution through the filter paper, being careful not to disturb or float the precipitate. Pour the last 100-200 ml of solution containing most of the hydrated oxide in the paper all at once. A wetted rubber policeman is used to thoroughly scrub the beaker. A piece of #42 ashless filter paper wetted with 1% w/v (NH4)2SO4 is used to complete the transfer. The precipitate is washed twice with hot 1% w/v (NH4)2SO4 and once with hot 2.5% w/v (NH4)2SO4. The filter is allowed to drain as dry as possible.

The paper is transferred to a tared quartz boat, and dried gently in an oven at 110° C.

The boat is placed in a quartz tube for final firing and reduction in the tube furnace. From a cold start (below 100° C), pass enough air over the sample to ignite the paper without mechanical loss of precipitate. Increase the furnace temperature slowly to 500° C and maintain this temperature until the paper ignition is complete. Pull the boat out of the heated section and allow it to cool to 150° C or less. Purge the tube with argon, then hydrogen. Complete the hydrogen reduction with sample in the heated section at 500° C, then to 600° C for 20-30 minutes.

Pull the sample out of the heated section to cool to less than 100 C with hydrogen being passed over the sample. Complete the cooling with carbon dioxide to ambient temperature (approximately 10-15 minutes).

The cooled ruthenium is washed twice with 1% w/v (NH4)2SO4 to dissolve the last traces of soluble salts. Ignite again in air and hydrogen as described above. Weigh as elemental ruthenium.

(4) Separation of Platinum ~

The platinum, palladium, rhodium, and iridium fraction in HClO4 from the distillation is evaporated to dryness in a beaker. The procedure takes considerable time and care since HClO4 is being fumed off. When the sample reaches a dry salt state and is cooled, distilled water and concentrated HCl are added, and the sample is evaporated again. The water, HCl treatment is repeated twice more. After the sample has been evaporated for the last time, it is diluted with distilled water to 300 ml. The sample is now ready to separate platinum from rhodium, palladium, and iridium. At this stage either an ion-exchange process, which is designed for production of larger quantities of separated ORMEs, or a non-precise quantitative separation may be used. The following procedure details the quantitative separation.

The sample is brought to a boil and 200 ml of 10% w/v NaBrO3 (sodium bromate) solution are added and the sample is boiled again. When the sample has reached boiling, it is removed from the heat, cooled to 40° C, and the pH is adjusted with a calibrated pH meter to pH 6 with a saturated NaCHO3 solution. 100 ml of 10% NaBrO3 are added and the solution is brought to a gentle boil for 15 minutes. The sample is then cooled and the precipitate is allowed to coagulate for 20-30 minutes.

The sample is then filtered on a medium porosity fritted glass filter and washed with 1% NaCl solution pH 6.5-7.5 (filtered during preparation through a 0.45 micron pad). The filtrate contains the platinum and the precipitate contains palladium, rhodium, and iridium as PdO2, RhO2 and IrO2 in hydrated form. The precipitate is redissolved with 6N HCl, boiled and reprecipitated as above two or more times to ensure complete separation of platinum from palladium, rhodium, and iridium.

The filtrates from the three precipitations are combined in a 1000 ml beaker and 50 ml of concentrated HCl are added. The sample is boiled to dryness to remove bromine and any traces of HClO4 that still might be present. Add 50 ml of water and 50 ml concentrated HCl. Boil to dryness again and repeat two more times, with the last time being to provide moist crystals rather than boiling to dryness. The sample is diluted to 200 ml with distilled water and 40 ml of HCl are added.

The sample is heated to a gentle boil and a stream of H2 (hydrogen) gas is passed through the sample for ten minutes, followed by passing a stream of H2S (hydrogen sulfide) gas through the solution while continuing with a flow of H2. The solution is allowed to cool while H2S is passing though it. The platinum precipitates as brown black PtS2.

The solids are filtered through #42 Whatman ashless filter paper and the precipitate washed with 1% v/v HCl. The filter and precipitate are transferred to a tared porcelain crucible. The filter is dried gently, then the residue ignited in air to red heat using a Meeker burner. The metal residue is leached with 1% v/v HCl and washed onto a second #42 ashless filter paper. The residue is washed thoroughly with hot distilled water. The filter is transferred to the same porcelain crucible, dried, and heated to red heat using a Meeker burner. The residue is weighed as platinum metal. The PtS2 precipitate can also be reduced under H2 in the tube furnace.

(5) Separation of Palladium ~

The precipitate of hydrated dioxides of palladium, rhodium, and iridium remaining from step (4) are dissolved in 1000 ml of 6 N HCl and diluted to 4000 ml with distilled water. The sample is then filtered on a 0.45 micron filter. To the solution is added a sufficient volume of 1% w/v dimethylglyoxime in 95% ethanol (250 ml) to precipitate all the palladium with gentle boiling. The sample is set aside for a minimum of one hour, then filtered into a tared porcelain filter crucible. Wash with 0.1 N HCl and then with water. The filtrate is retained for rhodium and iridium separation. The precipitate is dried at 1100° C and the yellow precipitate is weighed as palladium dimethylglyoxime, with palladium being 31.67% w/w of the total precipitate.

(6) Separation of Rhodium ~

The filtrate from the first palladium precipitation is diluted to 500 ml and 10 ml of concentrated H2SO4 and 10 ml of concentrated HNO3 are added. The filtrate is evaporated with heat until heavy fumes of H2SO4 are evolved. After cooling, 10 ml concentrated HNO3 are added and again heated until fumes are evolved. This treatment is repeated until no more charring results and all organic material has been destroyed. The solution remaining is cooled and 20 ml water are added. Evaporation with heating to heavy fumes is again repeated. The water wash is repeated two times to destroy any nitroso compounds that might interfere in the rhodium determination.

The solution is diluted to 200 ml and heated to boiling. A solution of 20% TiCl3 (titanous chloride) is added dropwise until the solution retains a slight pink color. Boil the solution for two minutes, cool, and filter the solution through Whatman #42 ashless filter paper. If any rhodium has precipitated out, wash the paper with 0.9 N H2SO4. Then char the filter paper in a 5 ml concentrated H2SO4. Add 5 ml HNO3 to heat and destroy organic matter as previously described. Dilute the solution with 50 ml water and combine with the filtrate from the TiCl3 precipitation.

The rhodium is separated from the iridium by removal of the excess titanium in a cupferron extraction with chloroform. The solution is chilled in an ice bath and placed in a 500 ml separatory funnel. To this 5 ml aliquots of chilled 6% aqueous cupferron are added, giving a milky yellow solution. If the cupferron solution is darkened, it should be treated with activated charcoal and filtered through a 0.45 micron pad. The titanium is extracted in 25 ml aliquots of cold chloroform. The extract is a clear yellow solution which is poured into a waste container. When no more yellow color is extracted, another 5 ml aliquot of cupferron solution is added. After many aliquots to remove the yellow titanium cupferrate, the extract turns a red brown. This fraction is collected in a separate beaker as the rhodium fraction. All extractions following this are added to the rhodium fraction in a 600 ml beaker. The extraction is complete when an aliquot of cupferron turns the solution milky white and the chloroform extract is clear to very light green. Retain the solution for iridium separation.

The extract is evaporated to dryness separating the chloroform from the rhodium fraction. 50 ml of aqua regia are added and the sample is evaporated to dryness to destroy organic material. Add 10 ml concentrated H2SO4 and 10 ml HNO3 and heat to fumes. Repeat HNO3 treatment until no more charring results and all organic material has been destroyed. The solution is cooled and 20 ml water is added, followed by evaporation to heavy fumes again. Repeat the water wash two times to destroy any nitroso compounds.

The sample solution is diluted to 200 ml with water. Then 10 ml of 10% NaBrO3 is added and the sample is heated to boiling. The sample is then cooled to 40° C and the pH adjusted to pH 6.0 with NaHCO3. 10 ml of NaBrO3 are added and the sample heated to a boil. The sample is cooled and filtered on a weighed porcelain crucible. The sample is dried in a vacuum oven and the precipitate is weighed as RhO2.

The material is then purified by dissolving the RhO2 precipitate from the weighing crucible with 6 N HCl and evaporate to moist salts and proceed as above.

The rhodium oxide is removed from the weighing crucible by using a 20% v/v H2SO4 solution. Then dilute the solution to 200 ml with water, and heat to boiling. Add dropwise a solution of 20% TiCl3 until the solution retains a slight pink color while boiling. A precipitate of rhodium will form. Allow the solution to cool to 40° C. If it loses color, boil and add more TiCl3. If color remains, filter through Whatman #42 ashless filter paper. The precipitate is washed with hot 10% v/v H2SO4 until the filtrate ceases to show the orange titanium complex with H2O2, then wash twice more.

Redissolve the rhodium as before to destroy the organic material. Add 10 ml concentrated H2SO4 and 10 ml of HNO3 to char the paper. Repeat the HNO3 treatment until no more charring results and all organic material has been destroyed. Cool the solution, add 200 ml water, and evaporate to heavy fumes again. Repeat the water treatment two times to destroy any nitroso compounds.

Add 20 ml of water and 10 ml of concentrated HCl. Gently boil the solution 15 minutes to get the rhodium into the state from which it can be precipitated as a sulfide. During treatment the color of the solution will change from yellow to rose. Filter the solution #42 Whatman filter paper and wash with 1% v/v HCl. Dilute the solution to 400 ml with water.

Precipitate the rhodium as sulfide from the solution kept at the boiling point by passing a rapid stream of H2S (hydrogen sulfide) gas through it. Allow the solution to cool with H2S passing through it. Allow the brown-black rhodium sulfide to settle.

Filter the produce sulfide through #42 Whatman ashless filter paper. Wash with 2.5% v/v H2SO4 and finally with 1% v/v HCl. Finally, dry the filter paper gently in a tared quartz boat.

Place the boat in the quartz tube for final firing and reduction in the tube furnace. From a cold start (below 100° C), pass enough air over the sample to ignite the paper without mechanical loss of precipitate. Increase the furnace temperature slowly to 500° C and maintain this temperature until paper ignition is complete. Then complete the air firing at 900° C for 20 minutes. Pull the crucible out of the heated section and allow it to cool to 200 C or less. Purge the tube with argon, then hydrogen. Complete the hydrogen reduction with sample in the heated section at 900° C for 20-30 minutes.

Pull the sample out of the heated section to cool to less than 100° C, with hydrogen being passed over the sample. Complete the cooling with carbon dioxide to ambient temperature for 10-15 minutes.

Wash the cooled rhodium twice by decantation with cool 1% w/v (NH4)2SO2 to dissolve the last traces of soluble salts. Dry gently, ignite again in air and hydrogen as described above. Weigh as elemental rhodium.

(7) Separation of Iridium ~

The solution left in the separatory funnel from the cupferron extraction contains the iridium. Transfer it quantitatively with a 1% v/v H2SO4 wash to a 600 ml beaker. Add 10 ml of concentrated HNO3. Evaporate to heavy fumes of H2SO4. Cool, add 10 ml more HNO3 and again heat to fumes. Repeat this treatment until no more charring results and all organic material has been destroyed. Cool the solution, add 20 ml water and evaporate to heavy fumes again. Repeat with the water treatment two times to destroy any nitroso compounds. Dilute with water to 300 ml.

Bring the sample to a boil and add 20 ml of 10% w/v NaBrO3 solution and boil again. When the sample has reached boiling, it is removed from the heat, cooled to 40° C, and the pH is adjusted with a calibrated pH meter to 7 with saturated NaHCO3 solution. Add 10 ml of 10% NaBrO3 and bring to a gentle boil for 15 minutes. The sample is then cooled slowly and the precipitate is allowed to coagulate for 20-30 minutes.

The precipitate is filtered into a tared porcelain crucible in a Walters crucible holder. Decant most of the solution through the filter crucible, being careful not to disturb or float the precipitate. Do not let the filter pull dry. Pour the last 10-20 ml of solution containing the precipitate into the filter. Be prepared to immediately rinse and police and beaker with 10% w/v NaCl solution. Dry the filter at 110C under vacuum for 1-2 hours. Dissolve the precipitate with 6N HCl and evaporate to moist salts and proceed as before, for a cleaner iridium fraction.

Wet the precipitate with saturated NH4Cl solution and approximately 100 mg of solid NH4Cl. Dry gently in a vacuum oven again at 110° C for 1-2 hours.

The sample at this point, which is the hydrated iridium ORME can be treated by alternate procedures. In the first procedure the sample will be treated to provide an iridium S-ORME and then utilized to establish the existence of a Meissner field, a property unique to superconducting materials. In the second procedure, the sample will be treated so as to form elemental iridium.

Procedure A ~

The iridium fraction is placed in a quartz ignition boat and the boat inserted into a tube furnace for slow reduction under hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas is flowed slowly over the sample maintaining a slight positive pressure in the tube at all times. The temperature of the tube furnace is raised very slowly and uniformly up to 850° C, taking care not to allow the heating rate to exceed 2° C per minute. The 850° C temperature is maintained for one hour, then the sample is slowly cooled under hydrogen gas, being careful not to exceed a 2.5° C reduction in temperature per minute until room temperature has been achieved. Nitrogen gas is then introduced into the tube and the hydrogen gas is shut off. The tube is then purged for eight hours with nitrogen gas. The sample at this point will be a grey-black amorphous powder. The powder is removed from the tube and then placed in a protected area so that it can react with air for at least two days (48 hours).

Approximately 10 mg of the resultant powder is transferred to a controlled atmosphere bifilar-wound heating element Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) instrument (Perkin-Elmer Thermal Analysis (PE/TGS-2), Temperature Programmer (PE/System 4), Thermal Data Station (PE/TADS). And Graphics Plotter (PE/THERM PLTTR). The sample is heated in the instrument at the rate of 1.2° C per minute under an atmosphere of helium gas to 850° C, and then immediately cooled at 2° C per minute to room temperature. The heating and cooling cycles are repeated four times.

The bifilar winding of the heating element possesses an extremely small magnetic field in that the weighed sample can never be exactly equal distance from both wires due to the winding configuration. The depolarized field will not react with ordinary metal samples or normal magnetic (N-S polarized) materials. However, a superconductor will react with an external magnetic field, even one of small magnitude.

FIGURES 8-17, which are weight/temperature plots of alternate heating and cooling of the iridium S-ORME sample material over five cycles, depict the Meissner field generation and the frequent collapsing and regeneration of the field. Specifically, FIGURE 8, Plot IR1H1, demonstrates the first heating cycle which establishes approximately a 26% weight loss. This weight loss is primarily due to loss of water. FIGURE 9, Plot IR1C1, read from the right to the left with 100% being the 75% of Plot IR1H1 (FIGURE 8), demonstrates weight gain and flux jumping upon cooling. The apparent weight gain and flux jumping establishes that the material is superconductive. A material such as iron which is not superconductive would show a plot which is essentially a flat line. The remaining plots, i.e., FIGURES 10-17, showing the effect of alternate heating and cooling, establish that each treatment extends the Meissner field generation in the direction of room temperature. FIGURE 17, Plot IR1C5, shows the flux jumping very close to room temperature.

The sample, after the above annealing treatment has been completed, will be white in color. The white powder is chemically inert to normal oxidation-reduction chemistries. It does not gain weight readily on exposure to air. However, gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide do apparently absorb to the surface resulting in "flux pinning" as the term is used in describing behaviour of superconducting materials of the S-ORME.

Procedure B ~

The sample is subjected to furnace ignition and hydrogen reduction. Place the filter crucible on its side in the quartz tube and insert into the tube furnace center. Start the air flowing gently. Allow the temperature to increase slowly to dehydrate the precipitate completely. Heat until all NH4Cl is sublimed at 360-375° C. Continue heating in air to 800° C.

Remove the crucible from the heated section of the furnace and cool to 200° C or less. Purge the tube with argon, then hydrogen. Complete the hydrogen reduction of the sample in the heated section at 800° C for 20-30 minutes.

Pull the sample out of the heated section to cool to less than 100° C while hydrogen is being passed over the sample. Complete the cooling by treatment with carbon dioxide for 10-15 minutes to ambient temperature.

Wash the cooled iridium with 1% w/v (NH4)2SO4  twice to dissolve the last traces of soluble salts. Dry gently, ignite again in air and hydrogen as described above. Weigh as elemental iridium, or the Ir-ORME. If the sample is partially dissolved in aqua regia in preparation for an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) testing, then the instrument will indicate the presence of metallic iridium. In other words, prior to treatment of the ore, conventional assay techniques indicated that no iridium was present. After treatment and separation of the ORMEs, a slow reduction under hydrogen gas, followed by aqua regia treatment, will convert part of the Ir-ORMEs into their constituent T-metal.
 
Loading...